Google
¡¡

Home | Product | Solution |Purchase | contract-us

¡¡
¡¡
The High-End Surveillance Market

HIGH-end Video Server Module board W1860

W1804 Video Server

W1802D both D1 Video Server

W1801D single channel video server D1

W1802C both CIF Video Server

W1801C CIF single channel video server

Is There a Market Opportunity for MV Companies?

Introduction
Close circuit video surveillance systems are nearly ubiquitous today in vulnerable locations. First introduced in the 1960� video surveillance systems have become central tools for providing security for critical infrastructure, institutions and establishments; including cargo ports, dams, airports, trains and subways, financial and governmental institutions, communication networks, power grids and oil transport and refining facilities. Video surveillance systems have also become widespread among businesses with entranceways, walkways and backdoors closely monitored by video cameras. In banks, surveillance cameras are strategically positioned to monitor and/or record the behavior of customers and tellers. Even corner convenience stores have embraced the use of video surveillance systems.

Conventional Versus High-End Surveillance Systems
In many cases, the systems deployed involve a relatively simple arrangement. A stationary camera continuously scans a scene within its field of view. The signal from the camera is then transmitted and recorded on a VCR, or observed in real-time on a monitor by security personnel, or both.

This conventional arrangement is highly limited in its capabilities. VCR tapes must be changed frequently and typically are saved for limited periods and then erased through re-recording. In larger scale deployments, security personnel sit before a bank of video monitors, attempting to detect threatening behavior. However, as human ability to process multiple video signals over extended periods is limited, the senses are easily overwhelmed with resultant attention lapses entailing potentially serious security breaches. Additionally, conventional video surveillance systems can suffer from technical deficiencies as in the case of low light conditions.

Fortunately, the state of the art of video surveillance is changing. In particular, the horrific events of 9-11 have underlined the need for more capable, higher-end video surveillance systems, providing an impetus for the development and deployment of such systems. At the same time, technological advancements have made it possible to answer this need. These advancements include:

  • Thermal imaging devices for low light conditions (primarily IR and Near-IR cameras)
  • Remotely controlled PTZ (point, tilt and zoom) cameras
  • Motion detection embedded in cameras to limit video signals to events worthy of observation and recording (Cameras begin scanning when triggered by motion, which limits the bandwidth needed for transporting video signals on the security network.)
  • Digital cameras in place of analog cameras (Digital video signals can more readily be transported over IP networks, processed by software and recorded on digital video recorders. Most importantly, digital video data can be processed by computers in contrast to analog video signals.)
  • IP addressable cameras to take advantage of Internet connectivity (IP transport of video signals offers far greater flexibility than traditional, point-to-point, analog networks. Once linked to an IP network, cameras can become part of a much more broadly deployed system where video feeds from distant locations can be recorded and analyzed centrally.)
  • Digital video recorders (DVRs) which record video signals on hard drives instead of VCR tapes
  • Sophisticated image processing software for system control, content analysis, retrieval and decision-making

Higher-end video surveillance systems (a.k.a. intelligent Video Surveillance Systems? for short) make use of these technological innovations. The central defining difference between conventional and higher-end video surveillance systems, however, lies in the way video signals are processed. In the case of conventional systems, humans process the signals with their eyes and brains and then determine appropriate responses. By contrast, IVS utilizes sophisticated software to process video signals for decision making. IVS is thus largely an automated, software-driven approach to surveillance.

How IVS Works
As with any surveillance system, the starting point with IVS is specifying the entity to be secured, such as an oil refinery, and the parameters of the physical area to be monitored, such as a perimeter fence. Threatening scenarios are then predetermined by level of severity and programmed into the system. Examples of such scenarios could include individuals or vehicles approaching or running near the fence, individuals appearing to be observing the facility from outside the fence (using the joint? and objects abandoned near the fence (such as high explosives in a suitcase). In effect, the surveillance system ? to look for specific anomalies, that is; activities or objects that depart from a normal, non-threatening baseline. When an anomaly is detected, the system can respond by automatically directing a PTZ camera to zoom in or investigate further from a different angle or camera. Where a threshold level is met, an alarm is triggered and transmitted to security personnel, enabling a real-time, protective response.

Importantly, IVS does not require the existence of a physical perimeter. In fact, the sophisticated software that comprises the core of an intelligent surveillance system can create virtual perimeters across land and water by means of a video tripwire at is drawn on a computerized camera snapshot.

To realize this capability, the system must first extract a exta-data? stream from real-time CCTV video that captures the activities of every object in the video stream. This is not video in the conventional sense but instead information about the raw video feeds that have been cleansed of redundant and irrelevant content. At the same time, the raw video feeds are compressed and archived for future retrieval.

To detect anomalies, IVS runs metadata through content analysis and inference engines based on sophisticated motion detection and image recognition algorithms, involving blob extraction by background modeling or frame differencing, blob or feature tracking from frame to frame; object classification by shape, size, color; and algorithms for determining the activities of individuals.

Beyond real-time applications, the use of metadata in IVS enables  analysis? where images stored on DVRs can be easily and quickly searched to examine activities occurring before and after alarms are sounded in an attempt to reveal the identities of perpetrators. Utilizing a user-friendly GUI, a security official, for example, could issue a command to the system, such as:  for a red SUV lingering before an airport terminal entrance.?nbsp; Or, because surveillance information can be stored centrally from multiple, remote locations, the same security official could perform a search for the same SUV at different airports in an effort to detect a pattern, signifying a potentially more widespread threat.

The Future of IVS and Market Opportunities for Machine Vision Companies
The future bodes well for IVS. Threats to strategic assets and to locations where large groups of people congregate are not likely to diminish soon, while -at the same time- the inadequacies of conventional security systems are painfully clear. A proliferation of intelligent, software-driven security systems is therefore likely. Based on the fusion of camera and information technologies, these systems will greatly magnify the ability of security personnel to protect society against serious threats.

Not surprisingly, large though varying- market opportunities are foreseen for IVS:

  • J.P. Freeman has forecast the size of the overall video surveillance market at $3 billion (USD) by 2007.
  • Axis Communications estimates the US security market at $4 billion (USD).
  • In-Stat MDR has placed the number of surveillance cameras sold in 2004 at 15.2 million, while ObjectVideo estimates annual sales of security cameras at 6 million.

Does this market opportunity lend itself to machine vision companies? The strong reliance of IVS on image capture and processing technologies suggests a good fit for machine vision companies. In particular, manufacturers of cameras, optics, imaging boards and software appear well positioned to reap benefits from IVS. As this illustrates, and as noted in previous articles, market opportunities for machine vision companies appear to lie increasingly beyond the factory floor. The good fortunes of the machine vision industry can only expand, as more and more companies seek and realize these new opportunities.

IP/Network camera server; Wireless Network Camera; Knowledge Articles

Network camera server:

Wireless network camera:

Related Articles: